The main difference between srtr and trt is that trt looks for one or more delimitets and srtr for a single on and requires less storage (the translate table).
Itschak בתאריך 13 במרץ 2015 20:52, "J O Skip Robinson" <[email protected]> כתב: > Yes, a one qualifier data set can be cataloged. We have one. > > SRST looks very cool. Thanks for the pointer! A simple loop searching for > '.' works but is not something to put on your resume. ;-) TRT is snazzier > but requires TLC for registers, especially R2. I imagine that TRT was > invented back in the day because so many routines needed to parse on > delimiters. SRST looks to be yet another improvement in the same quest. > > . > . > . > J.O.Skip Robinson > Southern California Edison Company > Electric Dragon Team Paddler > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager > 626-302-7535 Office > 323-715-0595 Mobile > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:41 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Need assembler trick to quickly get second and third DS > qualifiers > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:43:34 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: > > > >Watch out for the "no second qualifier" special case. FOOBAR is a valid > dataset name. > > > Can it be catalogued? Is it copacetic to SMS? (I think "SMPMCS" is > prevalent on SMP/E installation tapes, and the OP didn't require that the > data set was on DASD or catalogued.) > > Nor did he specify what he wanted if more than two qualifiers: all the > remainder, or only the second and third. > > In some cases, I've appended a separator character and removed it > afterwards in order to render special cases ordinary. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Pinnacle > >Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:28 AM > > > >I have a dataset FIRST.SECOND.THIRD, and I want to get SECOND.THIRD. > >Normally I would loop to one character at a time to get to the '.', but I > need performance here. I sure some of you assembler gurus could give me > some inscrutable assembler to get there in like one or two instructions. > Thanks in advance! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
