In
<CAAJSdjgEqM=ny94cfmkafhue_fbtvv7tueaphy8284_2m5u...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 03/17/2015
at 08:40 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>IMO, it would be easier to just use ATTACHX with the JSCB= pointing
>to a copy of the current task's JSCB with the APF bit flipped off.
Why? You still have the same considerations for, e.g., user key
storage.
>Another interesting parameter might be SZERO=NO
C/interesting/mandatory/
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
