Farley, Peter wrote: >Though your [Timothy] points are well spoken and reasoned, you still did not >address the basic organizational issue the OP is facing
Agreed 100%. As far as I see, the OP is sitting somewhere very uncomfortable and wishing for a quick relief. I agree there may be a reason to upgrade to new hardware (examples: using a new ARCH level or using a new fancy set of new things or just using larger tables as suggested earlier), ... ... but, first thing first - I still want to see that the first attempts to install new things are to be done on a sandbox and then moved to a production system without adding excessive resource usage. In the end, I agree with all posters, but I think we all should wait for the OP to clarify his position. In hindsight - I believe the OP is probably experiencing some known problem or overlooking something obvious. >On the other hand, said executive management may be of the same blindered type >as John McKown has told us he suffers under, in which case all bets are off >and the devil takes the hindmost. Agreed. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
