Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: >As I said previously, you make some cogent and relevant points, but to the >rest of us (well, at least to me) one of the key problems in the OP's >situation is still the organizational one, which you still did not address.
This is your second post to Timothy addressing more or less the same thing and I still agree with all what you said. > Unless the OP is not telling us everything (which I grant is possible, maybe > even probable), it appears that a tail is trying to wag the dog. I'm still waiting with a sore heart for the OP to clarify his dilemma. >Your voice is rational but the initial situation the OP described must surely >be intolerable to any viable business. It is indeed intolerable. >But maybe my imagination is too limited. No, you scored it all right! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
