Amen. Sent from iPhone - small keyboard fat fingers - expect spellinf errots.
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 8:20 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > In > <of1f97a172.f079794d-on48257e22.001a26e3-48257e22.001dd...@sg.ibm.com>, > on 04/09/2015 > at 01:26 PM, Timothy Sipples <[email protected]> said: > >> How do YOU know it's "even more expensive"? > > How do I know that yopu exist? > >> You haven't articulated an inviolable physical constant, like some >> theories in physics. > > Theories in Physics are provisional; evidence trumps theory.m > >> This issue is situational, > > Part of the stipulated situation is a regulation with stiff penalties. > >> "wait for 100% bug free, fully performance optimized code" > > Are we having a sale on straw dummies? The issue isn't whether to wait > forr 100% correct, but whether to do thorough testing before rolling > code into production. > >> That doesn't mean operators trying to say "No" to everything "new" >> is helpful. > > Neither inventing positions that nobody took. > >> Even when I seem to be the only rational voice in the room. :-) > > Responding to imaginary posts isn't rational. Why not address what > people actually wrote? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
