On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:13:52 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote: >One possible explanation for the no-JCL-change requirement....
It seems to me that we have done a lot of guessing based upon minimal information provided by the OP. The resource names that would be specified by the ENQ are not clear. Nor is it clear whether the OP understands the requirement that all processes that are protected by ENQ make the same request. It seems that the OP does not understand that IEBCOPY will not issue the ENQ that he intends to use to protect the program being updated. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
