I've experienced several instances of "antiquated convention" that were
byproducts of batch job owner generation via a feature of Top Secret and
ACF2. As are many old inherited conventions they're troublesome to
remove, more for cultural than technical considerations.
On 4/28/2015 11:02 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:42:39 -0300, Lucas Rosalen wrote:
If you have all your production jobs submitted under the same or just a few
userids, it might be hard to find your job filtering only by owner
(assuming you keep many outputs in spool).
I very rarely filter by owner myself though.
I do both, occasionally. Normally, I filter only by owner and sort by date.
OP appeared to be concerned with security, to which OWNER is more
relevant than JOB name; if the intent is mostly to avoid clutter,
"PREFIX xxx*" largely suffices.
(And there's the silly antiquated convention that the owner must be a
prefix of the jobname. That removes much filtering power.)
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
