But is it consistent with the special theory of relativity? Vacation Notice:
- none currently scheduled - Tom Puddicombe Principal Systems Engineer Mainframe Performance & Capacity Planning CSC 31 Brookdale Rd, Meriden, CT 06450 ITIS | (860) 428-3252 | [email protected] | www.csc.com This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. From: Elardus Engelbrecht <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 04/30/2015 02:24 AM Subject: Re: O/T Strontium atomic clock accurate to the second -- over 15 billion years -- Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> Ed Gould wrote: >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150421132031.htm? >utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed: >+sciencedaily/strange_science+(Strange+&+Offbeat+News+--+ScienceDaily) Thanks for this just in time OT post, but my dear Watson, is it really that accurate? Time will tell... ;-D But hey, I'm already late for my daily coffee... Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
