In <[email protected]>, on
06/01/2015
at 09:52 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<[email protected]> said:
>As the end user, I care little about the technical details of the
>blockage; only that the facility is unavailable.
That's fine if you don't really care about what you're asking for but
are only letting off steam. It's not productive if you really do care.
>And I might reverse the analysis and fault ISPF for relying on an
>inadequate service.
You might, if you didn't want to be taken seriously.
>An alternative approach might be to liberate ISPF from dependency on
>TSO.
Again? Why wasn't twice enough?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
