Which is what I said it did. What are you on about? On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < [email protected]> wrote:
> In > <cafo-8tq0gavpzyufbhxgwxuwik6jqw4wzkq+xob-5y9hgf3...@mail.gmail.com>, > on 05/31/2015 > at 01:54 PM, zMan <[email protected]> said: > > >Right, but this wasn't IBM, and was color (3279). > > 3279 is an IBM line, and 3rd party vendors rarely repurpose IBM model > numbers. > > >Clearly a 3290 competitor. > > Not if it can't display 4 sessions concurrently and don't let an > application carve up a 62x160 session. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
