In <[email protected]>, on
06/23/2015
at 03:37 PM, Paul Gilmartin
<[email protected]> said:
>Y'know there's grist here for the SER mill here. And any refutation
>that begins "Because [implementation details] ..." is unacceptable.
It's also the way that it's been documented since Old Man Noach
cornered the market in gopher wood. It's an enhancement request, even
though the original design lacked foresight.
IMHO the enhancement to request is the full functionality of XEDIT,
either as a prot, an ISPF enhancement or a separate editor obsoleting
both. Whatever, it won't happen unless and until someone presents a
compelling business case.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
