Interesting. At the time we crafted the bronze-plex, I could not see any way to 
share multiple RACF databases within a sysplex because AFAIK RACF sharing 
requires fixed structure names: IRRXCF00_P001 and IRRXCF00_B001. Has that 
requirement changed? If not, I don't see how I could share two different 
databases. As it is, two guys share one database using those structures, while 
the third guy uses a different database non-shared, i.e. no structure needed. 

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Thomas Conley
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Different Security Products in a Sysplex

On 7/29/2015 4:13 PM, J O Skip Robinson wrote:
> I refrained from answering earlier because we're an all-RACF shop. However, I 
> can comment the extent of (RACF) database sharing. We have a bronze-plex that 
> resulted from bolting together two previously independent parallel sysplexes, 
> one with two members and another with only one. These sysplexes were 
> independent for business reasons. RACF databases could not be combined 
> because a given userid or dataset might be defined in both with different 
> access levels.
>
> The result is a single parallel sysplex in which the two like members share 
> everything, while the third shares only enough to qualify for sysplex 
> licensing. (An IBM-invented game.) This arrangement is far from ideal, but 
> the two birds-of-a-feather share RACF while the odd man out has his own 
> non-shared database. It's been working OK for several years.
>
> .
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 626-302-7535 Office
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> [email protected]
>

I run into this all the time, especially when production, test, and sandbox 
LPARs are mixed into a sysplex.  Typically the production systems share a RACF 
DB, the test systems share a different RACF DB, etc.  Works fine.

Regards,
Tom Conley

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to