Alan -  Thank you!.
Things appear to be again running as expected.

John

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Staller, Allan <[email protected]>
wrote:

> F DFHSM,RELEASE MIGRATION
>
> This is normal behavior if there is a lack of *some resource*. The
> particular function is placed on hold.
>
> <snip>
>
> </snip>
> I'm taking my first faltering steps with DFSMSHSM, and have hit a
> situation that I don't understand.
> (I've checked around but have been unable to locate an HSM-specific
> mailing list, so I'm putting my query here in the hope that someone can
> provide some guidance.)
>
> The situation is that migration to ML2 has stopped working.
> I've got 8x3390 disks in use for L1, and a further 7 for L2 (as opposed to
> tape).
> Using 'On demand' migration, I have been able to migrate files from L0 to
> L1 and then on to L2, and also from L0 directly to L2. In order to
> understand how to handle ML1 and ML2 space shortages, I deliberately forced
> files to ML2 such that all 7 volumes became full. I then successfully
> recalled the files back to L0. The ML2 disks are now all currently 100%
> free (save for space used by VTOC, etc.)
>
> Now, when I try to send anything to L2, I see msg ARC0560E MIGRATION
> LIMITED: NO MIGRATION LEVEL 2 DASD VOLUME AVAILABLE. Any requests I make
> that are directed at L2 simply get queued.
>
> I've tried using DELVOL and ADDVOL commands for the disks, but that has
> not shifted the problem.
> I've looked at using the RECYCLE command, but it doesn't make sense to me
> (I can see why you'd use RECYCLE with tape-based ML2, but not with disks...)
>
> It is almost certain I've got one or more of the SETSYS parameter values
> in conflict with others, but I've been plugging away at this situation for
> some four days now with no progress. Thankfully, I'm using a test system,
> so 'bouncing' HSM is not a problem. However I do try to avoid that - it
> shouldn't be necessary in my view.
>
> Can anybody help, please? I'm looking for advice on what commands I might
> use to make ML2 space available again, and for some sort of explanation
> regarding the root cause of this problem.
> </snip>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to