On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:30:49 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>Until the "mad sysprog" (present!) decides to stuff the person (note
>proper use of non-sexist pronoun) down the elevator shaft. ...
>
For gender inclusiveness, I sometimes use "(fe)malefactor".
On 2015-09-02, at 07:32, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
>No JCL needs to and should allocate SYS1.LINKLIB, because it is in the LNKLST.
>
Perhaps to control library search order, as:
//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.LINKLIB
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=&SYSUID..LINKLIB
And I sometimes run Binder experiments with:
//STEP EXEC PGM=IEWL
//SYSLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.LINKLIB
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:43:54 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>I think that both Gil and I are assuming malevolent intent to do a denial
>of service.
>
(Or femalevolent.) But Kees was suggesting that the DoS would be ineffective
because it impacts no one.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
