The point of my question is that I understood OP to have had a problem that 
affected other users. Which is I why chased the wild goose into INTRDR 
specification. But it seems that this should no longer be a problem.  

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Bob Rutledge
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Submit job without messages

Yes, 1.7, the same one that caused me to redo several JES2 exits.  I think we 
both heard about that at the same Share session.

I can't imagine a system-wide limitation; I'd think address space limitations 
would be either DYNAMNBR or TIOT size.

Bob

On 9/4/2015 11:43 AM, J O Skip Robinson wrote:
> Wow. I was bowled over by the 'left us' comment. We still specify it even in 
> z/OS 2.1, but it seems indeed to have disappeared from the doc. Was that in 
> 1.7 with the JES2 redesign? If there is no longer a defined limit, why would 
> anyone still have a system-wide problem?
>
> .
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 626-302-7535 Office
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
> On Behalf Of Bob Rutledge
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 7:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Submit job without messages
>
> I believe RDINUM left us at the same time that internal reader processing 
> left the JES2 address space and moved to the address space of the requester.
>
> Bob
>
> On 8/29/2015 7:48 PM, J O Skip Robinson wrote:
>> Indeed this is not an unlimited resource, but it's controllable. The limit 
>> is specified in JES2 parmlib INTRDR RDINUM=. I've never seen TSO SUBMIT 
>> cause an internal reader shortage, but we have had problems in the past with 
>> CICS applications, which would allocate internal readers in order to submit 
>> jobs. This occurred in so many regions that we would hit the defined limit. 
>> Solution: increase the limit.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that SUBMIT allocates and releases an internal reader for 
>> each execution. If a lot of tasks--TSO users, batch jobs, regions, 
>> whatever--are bogarting internal readers, then either increase the limit or 
>> have a chat with the hogsters.
>>
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> J.O.Skip Robinson
>> Southern California Edison Company
>> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
>> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
>> 626-302-7535 Office
>> 323-715-0595 Mobile
>> jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
>> On Behalf Of Ed Gould
>> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 8:02 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Submit job without messages
>>
>> On Aug 29, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Tim Hare wrote:
>>
>>> Did not see this caveat, and I  had some big troubles from this, so 
>>> I have to mention this:
>>>
>>> IF you allocate an INTRDR under TSO, you need to find a way to limit 
>>> how many concurrent users use it.  Unless things have changed since 
>>> I retired, internal readers are _not_ an unlimited resource, there 
>>> are only so many defined in the system.  If you have a lot of 
>>> concurrent users of your submit process and they use up _all_ of the 
>>> internal readers, then regular SUBMIT commands can start failing .
>>
>> Try using free+close on the allocate.
>>
>> Ed
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to