On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:40:48 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>I wonder if it would be worth while to write an alternate SUBMIT command
>processor? But that's likely overkill since someone could easily create a
>SUBMIT REXX program to do the same, but use the INTRDR, allocated using
>BPXWDYN perhaps. The only minus is that this (REXX) would not invoke the
>TSO SUBMIT command exit code. Which might be OK since it is likely
>restricted to data which is FB/80.
>
The antecedent of "it" is unclear. What's "likely restricted to data which is
FB/80"?
Ther's also /bin/submit, which uses Rexx SYSCALL submit. SYSCALL submit
enforces FB/80. /bin/submit can read from any UNIX path, including a pipe.
>On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
>> It seems that TSO SUBMIT *assumes* statements such as IF, ELSE, and ENDIF
>> as operator commands!! It does not assume that for DD, JOB, and EXEC
>> statements (z/OS TSO/E Customization V2R1 SA32-0976-00, p. 300).
>>
Which chapter? (That's a thick manual and I'm lazy.)
If this affects ordinary TSO/E users, not just customizers, shouldn't it
also be mentioned in:
SUBMIT command
z/OS TSO/E Command Reference
SA32-0975-00
I don't see it there. RCF time?
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
