Hi Tom, Which is why I trying to ask if anyone had a solution/bypass to that statement.
I assumed, incorrectly, that since the ++HOLD was instream to the USERMOD, that a RESTORE and REJECT of a USERMOD would have also removed the instream ++HOLDs, but I am finding that is not true. Therefore need another WAY! >>I tried using ++RELEASE but that fails. Something about the ++HOLD being >>encoded inside the ++USERMOD. > >"++RELEASE statements do not affect ++HOLD statements within a SYSMOD >(internal HOLDDATA)." >- SMP/E Reference. Usage notes for ++RELEASE. > > >-- >Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
