On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:28:52 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >But presumably DUMMY, which would satisfy the OP. > >(Over-validation! Presumably if IEBCOPY just opened the d*mned DCB and wrote >to it they would be fine. But nooooooo, they had to "validate" the >destination. My ignorant guess, of course. Perhaps they had a good reason.) > SYSPRINT? Is it possible RECEIVE DYNALLOCs SYSPRINT and supplies an alternate DDNAME list? But why!?
I have one (rather Q&D) program where I attempt to DYNALLOC SYSPRINT (no REUSE); ignore any error; and call IEBGENER. I assume that if DYNALLOC fails the caller knew what he was doing. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
