In
<caajsdjgdcfhh4eonuruomvc7ovkk4wu8eado_yimw6fspnw...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 12/08/2015
at 03:21 PM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
> I do not really agree that not including the volser in the SYSDSN
>enqueue is a "flaw". If it were done, then their could need to be
>multiple ENQs, one for each volume in a multi-volume DSN.
The ENQ is for a PDS member; a PDS can't be multivolume.
>But remember this was designed in OS/360
Which didn't allow a multi-volume PDS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
