Thank you all for your replies. I will take your suggestions into consideration going forward. We are in the process of upgrading from z10 - > z12 -> z13 over the next few months. The CF upgrade is a part of this project. The CFs are going from 2097/E10 and 2098/E12 to 2817/M15.
I expect to see better structure response with these changes and will be surprised to see anything otherwise. Will keep you posted. Thanks again. On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Richards, Robert B. < [email protected]> wrote: > The archives probably have it, but simply put and if IIRC, there was an > old 9674 being used with z990s. Waiting on CF structure response was > horrific as compared to the speed of the z990 processor response. > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 7:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Coupling Facility Structure Re-sizing > > Richards, Robert B. wrote: > > >The last thing you want is for your CFs to be slower than the CPs. > >BTDTGTS > > Ouch. Could you be kind to tell us about it? Are there any manuals stating > that trouble? Any configuration changes to avoid? Or is it about the sizes > or quantity of LPARs involved? > > TIA! > > Groete / Greetings > Elardus Engelbrecht > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
