On 22 Jan 2016 18:22:41 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>In general, you have to rely on a hex dump of a few of the user SMF records,
>to look for obvious fields and contents, and ask your SYSPROGs/DBAs etc,
>what products are installed.  
>Sometimes there is a SUBSYSTEM ID that identifies the creator in bytes 15-18.  
>You can identify lots of EBCDIC text fields by content and length, like the 
>JOB, USERID, JCTJOBID, 44-byte DSNAMES, RACFGRUP names, the SMFSTAMP and 
>TODSTAMP datetime fields, and along with asking what products are installed,
>you can often identify the creator and find the SYSPROG who chose that SMF
>record type to confirm!

Then there are shop specific USER SMF records such as the PROC usage
records written in first JES3 IATUX32 then JES2 exit 6 track use by
PROC name and concatenation used that I created at Westinghouse Lamp
Divisions which became Philips Lighting.   The JES2 exit is in the
Philips mods on the CBT Tape.

Clark Morris 
>
>But often the final identification requires visual examination 
>of the record's hex dump, and to count the recognizable elements
>(e.g., 2 DSNAMEs, 3 TODSTAMP, 2 SMFSTAMP, JOB JCTJOBID), and then 
>examine a possible product's source member in MXG to count those
>same elements in the SAS INPUT statements to find a match, and
>then confirm by comparing field-by-field visually, or just
>by using that MXG code member to read the record.
>
>MXG has only 260 user SMF record members to examine.
>
>
>Barry
>
>
>Herbert W. “Barry” Merrill, PhD
>President-Programmer
>MXG Software
>Merrill Consultants
>10717 Cromwell Drive
>Dallas, TX 75229-5112
>[email protected]
>Fax:  214 350 3694 – Still works, received as email
>Tel:  214 351 1966 – Unreliable, please use email
>
>www.mxg.com        HomePage: FAQ answers most questions
>[email protected]      License Forms, Invoice, Payment, ftp information
>[email protected]    Technical Issues 
>MXG-L FREE ListServer  http://www.mxg.com/mxg-l_listserver/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
>Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
>Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 6:13 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Identifying creator of SMF records
>
>Alan,
>
>I think the better forum with be either the MICS Community on CA website or 
>MXG.COM 
>
>If you have SAS and MXG or SAS and MICS, one of them might have a cross 
>reference or way to determine SMF details.
>
>I have usually maintained a text file in SYS1.PARMLIB that contains a list of 
>either SVCs or SMF records for non IBM products.
>
>If you do not have that, then you may have to find another way.  And I am not 
>sure how that can be done if you do not have the ability to search any and all 
>installation libraries for vendor products to see what pops up.
>
>Sometimes shops will use the defaults supplied by the Vendors and that will be 
>documented in the vendors installation manual.  So I would start with that.
>
>
>
>Lizette
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: "Field, Alan" <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Jan 22, 2016 2:30 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Identifying creator of SMF records
>>
>>Is there a way to identify what is creating user written SMF records?
>>
>>We have 210s, 230s and 254s that we can't identify the source.
>>
>>We've dumped the records and looked at them. Some give hints (e.g. the 230s 
>>look like perhaps CA OpsMVS, the 254s perhaps something related to SAF).
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>Alan
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
>[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to