On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Lopez, Sharon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any experiences (good or bad) with secondary maintenance > type companies that will support IBM mainframes? > > Thanks to everyone in advance. > We've had a company called SMS for years. I've liked the employees and they are competent. The only machine that gives them any problems is our 3584, which we got pretty much the instant it was announced. This monster is used by both the z/OS system _and_ our LAN environment. http://www.sysmaint.com/ -- Werner Heisenberg is driving down the autobahn. A police officer pulls him over. The officer says, "Excuse me, sir, do you know how fast you were going?" "No," replies Dr. Heisenberg, "but I know where I am." Computer Science is the only discipline in which we view adding a new wing to a building as being maintenance -- Jim Horning Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted. He's about as useful as a wax frying pan. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
