On Feb 10, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:26:17 +0100, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
?That doesn?t apply to ?true?, though, right??
?Of course not, use some common sense.?
That would require the knowledge of /bin/true to be common sense,
which I doubt. I like the idea of help being available even for
what might look like an obvious command to some.
Agreed. And "IEFBR14" is far less "common sense" than "true". So,
where
does IBM document IEFBR14. Utilities? No, those are largely "IEB"
prefix.
A brief search turns up several documents that mention use of
IEFBR14, but
none that officially specify it. It shouldn't default to "That's
common knowledge,"
as an IBM employee has here attempted to justify absence of
documentation
of another z/OS facility.
---------------------SNIP----------------------
I don't recall of it ever being documented, anyone?
Just to be totally correct there are *NO* messages that it produces
so there is no prefix needed.
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
