Google search with the search terms - Iefbr14 site:IBM.com Yields a bunch of results, including IBM manuals.
HTH, Linda Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Ed Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> On Feb 10, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:26:17 +0100, Peter Hunkeler wrote: >> >>>> ?That doesn?t apply to ?true?, though, right?? >>>> ?Of course not, use some common sense.? >>> >>> That would require the knowledge of /bin/true to be common sense, which I >>> doubt. I like the idea of help being available even for what might look >>> like an obvious command to some. >> Agreed. And "IEFBR14" is far less "common sense" than "true". So, where >> does IBM document IEFBR14. Utilities? No, those are largely "IEB" prefix. >> A brief search turns up several documents that mention use of IEFBR14, but >> none that officially specify it. It shouldn't default to "That's common >> knowledge," >> as an IBM employee has here attempted to justify absence of documentation >> of another z/OS facility. > ---------------------SNIP---------------------- > I don't recall of it ever being documented, anyone? > Just to be totally correct there are *NO* messages that it produces so there > is no prefix needed. > > Ed > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
