Walter Marguccio wrote: >Which might mean that if my zBC 12 is, say, 80% CPU busy, a given outbound >trasmission will be slower comparedto the same transmission which takes place >when the zBC 12 is only 20% CPU busy. .
Really? >What my co-workers wants to know is whether an outbound ftp transmission on a >zBC 12 can be assigned to a processorwhich works a full speed, or , viceversa, >the performance of the transmission is affected by how busy the CP and/or the >SAP is/are.. Bottleneck is usually with the network traffic, speed of network hardware (OSA cards for example) and/or the priority of your FTP server and TCP/IP stack(s). Are you running any traces or checkpointing during that transmission? Do you have tools to do traces? Check your transfer rates shown in EZA1617I messages. Are they varying wildly, even within a batch job? For example, in one job with low WLM priority, I see for one dataset this rate of 100.30 Kbytes/sec and the next dataset is 2649.40 Kbytes/sec. That is of no concern for me, because the datasets were copied successfully. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
