On 15 March 2016 at 14:57, Paul Gilmartin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> >alloc ddname(steplib) path('/usr/bin')
> >IKJ56236I  PATH /usr/bin INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED
> >
> >which is still complaining about STEPLIB, not '/usr/bin'.
> >
> >This surely calls for one of Gil's well formulated SRs. IBM has changed
> >some of the sillier TSO messages over the years, so it's not that there's
> >no hope at all.
> >
> That probably needs an RFE, not an SR.  Really, it should clarify:
>     IKJ56236I  PATH /usr/bin INVALID, FILENAME STEPLIB RESTRICTED
>

Better yet,
IKJ56236I  PATH /usr/bin INVALID, DDNAME STEPLIB RESTRICTED

Or even better, since there's nothing at all wrong with the PATH,
IKJ56236I  DYNAMIC ALLOCATION USING DDNAME STEPLIB IS NEVER ALLOWED

Hey!  I just tried:
>     user@OS/390.25.00: rexx "say BPXWDYN( 'alloc dsn(SYS1.LINKLIB) old
> msg(2)' )"
>     IKJ56225I DATA SET SYS1.LINKLIB ALREADY IN USE, TRY LATER+
>     IKJ56225I DATA SET IS ALLOCATED TO ANOTHER JOB OR USER
>     IEFA110I DATA SET CONTENTION
>     DATA SET SYS1.LINKLIB IN USE BY
>     SYSNAME  JOBNAME  ASID
>     smf1     job01    0006
>     smf1     LLA      001B
>
> A miracle!  IEFA110I is new with 2.2!
>

Now *that* is cool!


> Batch JCL doesn't tell you; it just waits.


It could still produce the messages, surely.

Tony H.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to