On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:20:27 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote: >> Does this message appear even if link-edit parameters appear in >> the UTILITY entry in the TZONE? > >Yes. > Ouch. "Boy who cried 'Wolf!'" effect. Well:
o Should the contributors who were irritated by GIM24701W simply be sanguine about RC=4 from ACCEPT as you recommended long ago, or: o Should I consider adding a meaningless LEPARM to every MOD element? I'm thinking of (LIST,XREF,NCAL,LET,OL) -- the type O-negative of PARMs. Is there any harm in that? (OL? Well, an overenthusiastic tester once tried executing a program from a DLIB and filed a trouble report when it program-checked. OL guarantees just an earlier failure. Unless he tries LOAD; CALL.) In link-edit JCL one can specify a maximum RC on the NAME statement. But that applies to target zone. Is there a way to do likewise for DLIB zone? Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
