Try adding CASE(MIXED) to your binder parms.
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:29:18 -0500 > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM > To: [email protected] > > Thanks Don! > > I switched the SYSLIN to include the .x file > > //SYSLIN DD * > INCLUDE '/u/Java6_31/J6.0/bin/j9vm/libjvm.x' > INCLUDE OBJECT > NAME CALLJAVA(R) > //* > > The binder output shows this now > > IEW2278I B352 INVOCATION PARAMETERS - > LIST(NOIMP),AMODE=31,MAP,RENT,DYNAM(DLL) > IEW2322I 1220 1 INCLUDE '/u/Java6_31/J6.0/bin/j9vm/libjvm.x' > > IEW2322I 1220 160 INCLUDE OBJECT > > IEW2322I 1220 161 NAME CALLJAVA(R) > > IEW2456E 9207 SYMBOL JNI_CreateJavaVM UNRESOLVED. MEMBER COULD NOT BE > INCLUDED > > Why isn't JNI_CreateJavaVM resolved by libjvm.x? > > Janet > > >It's the .x file that needs to be included in SYSLIN. I've never heard of > >SIDEFILE as a DD name. The .so file is the "shared object" or DLL file. > >That's only needed at run-time. If you're using some Apace SDK, I would > >look for a side file that comes with it. Again, you'd also need the Apache > >.so file available somewhere at run-time. Make sure you set the DYNAM(DLL) > >binder option. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
