Do a little googling on the license question. I can't think of any problems from going with the MIT license, but IANAL.

On 03/28/16 10:25, John McKown wrote:
  ...
Anyway, I'm still thinking of how it will be designed. But I am curious if
the requirement of z/OS 2.1 would make it unusable to a lot of people here.
I know we have some members who are still on OS/390. My employer is
stabilized on z/OS 1.12.

But you're talking about interfacing with a feature of z/OS 2.1 and above.

I wanted to say something about "avoid excessive requirements", but don't make your life complicated. (Unless you just wanna re-invent ENF code 78 functionality.) Keep it simple.


Oh, any_decent_  ideas about what to call this? I'm so non-marketing
oriented, I would likely call is YAJSTS (Yet Another Job Submission &
Tracking System). Which a decent synopsis of what it_is_, but is not
pronounceable. I'll work on that name.

I can't help with that, but ... _the name is essential_. I remember one guy, a brilliant programmer, who simply could not start on a certain project until he had the name. (It became a major tool in that organization in those days.) So ... excellent vision recognizing that need at this stage. Please just don't name it after a child's pet or toy. "USPS Jeep" would be more fitting. Or maybe Take-a-Number. No, that one's taken.

-- R; <><




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to