Rick,

Also take into account the type of person doing the design some ppl are
'part to whole' others are 'whole to part'.
Like John, I have been thinking about some tool, i work for a Identity
Management Software company, so my thoughts
are want is needed or wanted in RACF or ACF2 or Top-Secret arena...

Scott

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, John McKown <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Rick Troth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Do a little googling on the license question. I can't think of any
> > problems from going with the MIT license, but IANAL.
> >
> >
> > On 03/28/16 10:25, John McKown wrote:
> >
> >>   ...
> >> Anyway, I'm still thinking of how it will be designed. But I am curious
> if
> >> the requirement of z/OS 2.1 would make it unusable to a lot of people
> >> here.
> >> I know we have some members who are still on OS/390. My employer is
> >> stabilized on z/OS 1.12.
> >>
> >
> > But you're talking about interfacing with a feature of z/OS 2.1 and
> above.
> >
>
> ​Yes, this will be tested on a friend's z/OS 2.2 system, not on my
> employer's system. ​
>
>
>
> >
> > I wanted to say something about "avoid excessive requirements", but don't
> > make your life complicated. (Unless you just wanna re-invent ENF code 78
> > functionality.) Keep it simple.
> >
>
> ​Looks like ENF code 70 is very similar, except that it is invoked for
> _every_ JOB, STC, and TSU that goes through JES. Whereas ENF 78 is only
> invoked for JOBs which are submitted when the JES symbol SYS_JOB_NOTIFY
> exists. Apparently with _any_ value, just that it simply exists.​
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Oh, any_decent_  ideas about what to call this? I'm so non-marketing
> >> oriented, I would likely call is YAJSTS (Yet Another Job Submission &
> >> Tracking System). Which a decent synopsis of what it_is_, but is not
> >> pronounceable. I'll work on that name.
> >>
> >
> > I can't help with that, but ... _the name is essential_. I remember one
> > guy, a brilliant programmer, who simply could not start on a certain
> > project until he had the name. (It became a major tool in that
> organization
> > in those days.) So ... excellent vision recognizing that need at this
> > stage. Please just don't name it after a child's pet or toy. "USPS Jeep"
> > would be more fitting. Or maybe Take-a-Number. No, that one's taken.
> >
>
> ​Well, right now, I'm writing code and documentation on Linux/Intel. It's
> sitting in the directory: ~/zos/YAJSTS ​for lack of a better name.
>
> Some of what I'm doing might be ?unacceptable? to z/OS people because I'm
> writing documentation, like the README, in Linux for rendering on Linux.
> E.g. README.md is a plain text README file, in "markdown" format. This is
> readable by people as is, but can be rendered into HTML or UNIX man or a
> number of other formats using a program called pandoc. When I actually get
> around to writing documentation, I plan to use either LyX, or (more likely)
> TeXstudio. LyX uses its own, plain text, file format, and renders into
> LaTeX. TeXstudio uses LaTeX as its native file format. LaTeX is a
> plain-text markup language which can be converted via a number of different
> programs into many formats such as HTML, HTML5, PDF, MS Word docx (why
> would I do that?!?), and a ton of others. Basically, this means that the
> entire system is being developed with a UNIX mind-set instead of a
> conventional z/OS mind-set. I, personally, consider this acceptable because
> the code is going to be using UNIX facilities, so UNIX will need to be
> running correctly for it to work at all. I will likely include a job to
> copy the UNIX resident files into PDSE libraries. I say PDSE because that's
> what I use. I guess it might be possible to use a legacy PDS as well. I
> know that many here despise PDSEs. I've been very fortunate to have never
> had a problem with them.
>
>
>
> >
> > -- R; <><
> >
> >
> --
> How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb? One to hold the
> giraffe and one to fill the bathtub with brightly colored power tools.
>
> Maranatha! <><
> John McKown
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to