The suggestion was based on not seeing or expecting any change with IO for ABO'ed programs. COBOL IO is through routines, which very quickly end up at QSAM, or whatever. There's nothing in V5 or V6 to indicate improvement in performance for IO directly. I didn't see anything for ABO either, although I perused rather than studied.
On Friday, 1 April 2016 01:48:26 UTC+1, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > I appreciate the suggestion, but I'm not much interested in efficiency. I > want a program that does lots of I/O and calculations to see what benefit we > could get from ABO. This is the Before picture to be compared with the After > picture. Running with an input of 300 records and iteration of 3,000, I'm > using a little under 6 seconds of CPU time while creating two 6,000 cylinder > output files. It's a good start. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
