DB2 should have a higher importance than what it serves, so in this case 
it should be Importance 1. I'd set its goal velocity to what's achievable 
- probably 70, likely 80, maybe 90. I would not mess with eg 75, 85.

By "DB2" I mean DBM1, DIST and MSTR. IRLM should be in SYSSTC.

You'd be surprised how many customers get this wrong. :-(

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: [email protected]

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker

Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker

Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): 
https://developer.ibm.com/tv/category/mpt/



From:   Tracy Adams <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   28/04/2016 20:57
Subject:        Re: WLM issue with a proposed solution
Sent by:        IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>



The importance (priority) of DB2 is set 2, as well as the CICS service 
class.  It serves both the CICS and batch jobs.

I only speak of dispatching priorities because isn't ultimately that is 
driven by the collective results of WLM?

To Mark's question, I am not sure what is stalling those transactions, I 
will try to collect some delay information. 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: WLM issue with a proposed solution

Hello Tracy.

What importance have you set DB2 address spaces' service class(es) to? 
Likewise the things it serves, such as CICS regions and CICS transactions/

If DB2 is getting locked out it could be caused by it being Imp 2 or 
something, rather than Imp 1 with a goal 70+.

I also note you're mainly talking dispatching priorities rather than WLM 
language.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud & Systems 
Performance, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: [email protected]

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker

Blog: 
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker

Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): 
https://developer.ibm.com/tv/category/mpt/



From:   Tracy Adams <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   28/04/2016 19:22
Subject:        WLM issue with a proposed solution
Sent by:        IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>



So here is my issue:

We have a soft capped LPAR that runs our DB2 and CICS regions and during 
the day some "marketing batch".  On Wednesdays, the marketing batch 
(online submit via CICS) increases and by afternoon we hit our 4 hour soft 
cap.  Once or twice while we are capped, the busiest CICS slow down to the 
point where some old automation kicks in to kill transactions over 45 
seconds old, some of these transactions dump through DumpMaster, we then 
go to max sockets and more transactions dump and in 10 - 30 seconds all is 
fine again.

What I see: The CICS regions have a DP around EC and are meeting their 
service goal of 99% under .5 seconds.  But there are tens of thousands 
transactions that have led to this.  The batch jobs (3-5 of them), while 
running 10 - 15 % cpu have a DP of C0 and are in a discretionary level of 
the service class.  I believe the problem lies with the DB2 service class. 

 That has a definition of velocity at 66  and it tends to run below that 
when there is more contention in the system.  The DP of the DB2 region is 
F6. 

My theory:  when this brown out occurs the resources are maxed out and the 
CICS regions being the ones that have meet their goal and will have to 
suffer many transactions missing the service goal to make the DP go up. 
They get hung up just long enough to cause the delays that trigger the 
"panic" automation to clear the stalled transactions.  Chaos breaks out! 

My proposal:  A.  limit the batch jobs to a max of three by controlling 
open initiators for their job class.  B.  change the DB2 velocity to 60 C. 

 Starve the CICS service goal by reducing it to 99% in .4 forcing his DP 
to be a little more desperate.

Thoughts?

TIA,

Tracy

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email 
to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email 
to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to