On 18/05/2016 0:53, John Eells wrote:
- Added support for both SHA-2 (SHA-256) and 2048-bit RSA certificates.**
- Put the package signing verification certificate where "anyone could get it"
- Made the signing (certificate-based) check optional.
- Continued to keep the integrity checking optional, whether based on SHA-2 or SHA-1.

Would that meet the set of needs we've been talking about?

* As usual, no promises.
** I think we have to keep the SHA-1 support because we create an incompatibility if we don't.

From Donald's post it sounds like the original problem might be the FTPS/HTTPS certificates, not the SHA1 verification of data already transmitted over a secure channel. This makes more sense from an audit point of view, and I think someone suggested a firewall was complaining - it would have no awareness of what was done with the data after transmission. In that case fixing the certificate is the simple solution.

I just checked deliverycb-bld.dhe.ibm.com and I see a different certificate chain to Donald - I see the 023456 GeoTrust Global CA. Is it possible that it resolves to multiple hosts with different certificates e.g. in different countries, or that it has just been fixed?

On the question of package signing, I would suggest that it should be done using the usual methods which means that you don't need to put a certificate where anyone can get it.

z/OS should have the common root CAs installed with the operating system (if it doesn't already). Then (as I understand it) the signed certificate is included with the signature. To verify it you then follow the chain of signed certificates until you get to one signed by the root CA that you already have.

This means that you can verify the origin of something without knowing the correct place to get that particular public key.

Andrew Rowley


--
Andrew Rowley
Black Hill Software
+61 413 302 386


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to