Chales, 2321 was a data cell (magnetic strip) hardly could be called DASD) I don’t recall a 3314 . The removable 3340 (not sure the number anyone?)
Ed > On May 16, 2016, at 7:47 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 2301, 2321. > CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Steve Thompson <[email protected]> > Date: 05/16/2016 4:51 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: What was a 3314? (was: Whither VIO) > > 2314, 2419, 2311, these are just a few of the "IBM" DASD that > I've had the pleasure of working with. I've forgotten the drum > device numbers and the noodle snatcher model number. > > Regards, > Steve Thompson > > On 05/16/2016 07:24 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >> OK, the sleeping dog wants some attention. Before my first reply, I >> carefully Googled device type 2314 to verify the number. Then I typed '3314' >> because who has ever worked with DASD that started with something other than >> '33'? 2314 remained valid in the IODEVICE macro long, long after the final >> one disappeared into the sunset. And as I said, I was advised to use it for >> VIO because of 'device architecture', whatever that meant. Track size, I >> guess, from what others have posted. >> >> . >> . >> . >> J.O.Skip Robinson >> Southern California Edison Company >> Electric Dragon Team Paddler >> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager >> 323-715-0595 Mobile >> 626-302-7535 Office >> [email protected] >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Clark Morris >> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 4:16 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: (External):Re: What was a 3314? (was: Whither VIO) >> >> [Default] On 16 May 2016 07:01:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main >> [email protected] (Jerry Callen) wrote: >> >>> In the "Whither VIO" thread, J.O.Skip Robinson wrote: >>> >>>> In a previous life, we defined VIO (I believe) to device 3314 even >>>> though we had none left on the floor >>> >>> That's a device type I've never heard of, and the Google knows not of. >>> Could this be a typo for "2314"? >> >> I believe the OP meant 2314 which had 7294 bytes per track. It was a >> removable disk. >> >> Clark Morris >>> >>> -- Jerry >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
