> On May 18, 2016, at 7:50 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > > I remember them well. I was answering Steve's two implied questions. > > 2321 was certainly characterized as DASD. It was indeed a direct access > storage device. Not a disk, but DASD nonetheless. Certainly not magnetic tape > (though it had a family resemblance!) and certainly not unit record.
It addressing had MMBBCCHHR(R?) so I guess you could address it directly. Anyone remember how to do that? (progr5amming for a 2321 is a lost art (where is Seymour?). Ed > > I don't think anyone recalls a 3314. I think the OP said it was a typo, 2314 > mis-remembered as 3000-series DASD. > > Charles > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Edward Gould > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: What was a 3314? (was: Whither VIO) > > Chales, > > 2321 was a data cell (magnetic strip) hardly could be called DASD) I don’t > recall a 3314 . The removable 3340 (not sure the number anyone?) > > Ed > >> On May 16, 2016, at 7:47 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> 2301, 2321. >> CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Steve Thompson <[email protected]> >> Date: 05/16/2016 4:51 PM (GMT-08:00) >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: What was a 3314? (was: Whither VIO) >> >> 2314, 2419, 2311, these are just a few of the "IBM" DASD that I've had >> the pleasure of working with. I've forgotten the drum device numbers >> and the noodle snatcher model number. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
