Just figure out that LOCATE seems to handle it. Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > I want to resolve an existing GnnnVnn for a GDG using a (0) or (-n) > reference, but in this case I don't want to allocate the data set. > > Is there a better way than to list the HLQ.GDG.* catalog entries with > IGGCSI00 and then pick off the minus nth entry? (is this even correct in > all cases?) > > > BTW - I always want the "latest" table (for BPXWDYN, this is "GDGNT" ) > > Thanks, > > Kirk Wolf > Dovetailed Technologies > http://dovetail.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
