I agree with the OP's suggestion that there should be fine grained control to allow unauthorized jobs to write certain types of SMF records.
Perhaps a BPX.SMF.TYPxx resource? Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Andrew Rowley <[email protected] > wrote: > On 31/05/2016 16:14, Martin Packer wrote: > >> On the "add Java statistics to the SMF record" point note NOTHING gets to >> inject stuff into SMF 30. >> > > I'm not suggesting that Java itself inject anything into SMF 30, the > thought was that the JVM could keep statistics in some system area that was > then incorporated in a new section in the SMF 30 record, i.e. similar to > the Unix Process Section or Counter Data Section. But it's probably true > that Java statistics are too specific for a general record like type 30. > > My main point however was that if you need BPX.SMF access to write JZOS > statistics, you can also write any data into any SMF record type you like, > including writing your own type 30, type 80, type 89... > > > -- > Andrew Rowley > Black Hill Software > +61 413 302 386 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
