Some "user" records are not really "user" records. ACF2 writes type 230 records. Top Secret writes type 231 records. Our IND$FILE auditing writes type 202 records. (All are configurable default record numbers.)
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Rowley Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 6:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: BPX.SMF misuse? On 01/06/2016 01:54 AM, Lindy Mayfield wrote: > If you try to call BPX1SMF with an SMF record number of 128 or less you'll > get a return code 121, EINVAL. So only user SMF records are allowed. > That's not as bad as I thought then, but most sites would consider user SMF records as important. Interesting... JZOS writes type 121, and I thought it wasn't writing records without access to BPX.SMF... maybe I need to retest and confirm. Andrew Rowley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
