Jake: While I sympathize with your issue. I think a lot of vendor code might break at 64K. I vaguely remember discussing this with a vendor after setting it. Although I suspect the real “user” is DB2 and anyone with DB2 and some vendor code would have run into this ages ago. Ed > On Jun 21, 2016, at 10:55 PM, Jake Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Lizette > > Thank you for this. > > Jake > On Jun 22, 2016 1:42 AM, "Lizette Koehler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> After the discussion, I went ahead and put in a RFE for IEF240I TIOT >> Exceeded >> message. >> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=90368 >> >> Basically it is requesting IBM to enhance the message to include >> XK out of YK TIOT storage needed >> Or >> XK exceeds YK for TIOT storage >> >> And if XK is huge - for example 72K - then the user will be able to see >> what has >> been exceeded. Since the TIOT is only 64K in size, they would need to >> break the >> datasets up or reorg them to fit in the current size of the TIOT. >> >> >> >> If you like it, please vote for it. >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> Lizette Koehler >> statistics: A precise and logical method for stating a half-truth >> inaccurately >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
