Actually, I think you are correct, my use of "Copyright" was wrong, but I think 
that the sentiment is the same and protecting the "Integrity" of the 
information contained in the document is just as important.

I like the additional information you have provided and you know that IBM has 
the Lawyers involved, so ..........

Al Nims
University of Florida

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AW: Re: IBM Knowledge Centre

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) <ajn...@ufl.edu> wrote:

> I like your comments about ePubs and PDF, with the respect of readers 
> being available for multiple platforms.
>
> Now looking at it from IBM's point-of-view and "Copyright" material, 
> are ePubs a little easier to "Edit" than a PDF?  I really do not know 
> that answer, that is why I am asking.  I believe that PDFs can be 
> protected from being "Edited" and still allow it to be read without 
> having to enter a password, is there something similar for ePubs?  I 
> do not know how much protection can be done in an ePub and again, I 
> "Think" my statement about PDFs is correct, but I have been known to 
> be wrong before! :)
>

​I understand your question. But I don't understand why IBM would want to stop 
someone from "editing" a PDF. Well, I do in a way, to maintain integrity of the 
information. But so far as copyright is concerned, unless allowed, it is 
illegal to make a copy of a "book" (PDF document in this
case) and re-distribute it. Back in the "dead tree" days, there wasn't anything 
that stopped a person with a pen or mark-up pen from "editing" a manual. And 
then they could (physically) make a copy of those pages and distribute them. Of 
course, the edits were a bit obvious. Hum, does IBM allow you to copy an 
unmodified PDF which is "generally available" via the web and give it to 
another person? I know that some web publishers are saying that "deep linking" 
to an article on their site is a copyright violation. They want users to go to 
their home page and then click-through to the article for ad revenue. Again, 
IMO, this "webvertising"​ was thought up in the lower regions of the place of 
eternal damnation. I get this a lot on my comics sites. I'd rather pay a 
distributor to email the comics I like directly to me. Or make a personal 
comics page specifically for me which requires a "key" of some sort (my bank 
does this - won't allow access by a computer unless the computer has the "key" 
installed).



>
> Al Nims
> University of Flordia
>
>
--
"Pessimism is a admirable quality in an engineer. Pessimistic people check 
their work three times, because they're sure that something won't be right.
Optimistic people check once, trust in Solis-de to keep the ship safe, then 
blow everyone up."
"I think you're mistaking the word optimistic for inept."
"They've got a similar ring to my ear."

From "Star Nomad" by Lindsay Buroker:

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to