Sorry... didn't see Peters original ... check ifa member in parmlib to ensure 
you don't have the rmf enabled



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: Cheryl Watson <[email protected]> 
Date: 07/12/2016  4:20 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: SMF type 89 records reporting RMF usage 

Hi Peter,

Usually, RMF does NOT show up on the SCRT report that you create to send IBM.  
It will show up, however, on their bill coming back (also in Excel format).  
Where are you seeing it?  If it's on the bill, then here is what is happening:

1.  When you sign a license for z/OS, you also indicate which other 
entitlements come with that, such as RMF, DFSORT, and similar tools.  If you 
have alternative products, such as CMF or SYNCSORT, then you would remove those 
entitlements during the license signing.

2.  IBM keeps that information in their license database.

3.  You run an SRCT report that shows all of the LPARs where z/OS runs.  IBM 
bills you for every entitlement in every LPAR where z/OS runs, whether you run 
the component or not.  Therefore, if RMF is an entitlement in your license, 
then RMF will show up in every LPAR.

So EITHER you should have removed RMF as an entitlement once you installed CMF, 
OR you are running RMF in at least one LPAR and you're getting charged for all 
LPARs (but there's nothing you can do about that - it's the way it works).

Is this the situation in your case?

Best regards,
Cheryl


Cheryl Watson
Watson & Walker, Inc.
100 Central Ave, Suite 1013
Sarasota, FL 34236
P-941-924-6565, F-941-924-4892
www.watsonwalker.com



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Peter Ten Eyck
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SMF type 89 records reporting RMF usage

Our SCRT reporting for IBM showed type 89 records that indicted that RMF was 
used. We do not run RMF, we run CMF. I am looking back at syslogs and SMF data; 
I am trying to determine what caused that (RMF usage) type 89 record to get 
cut. It does not appear that the RMF STC was started… wondering what else could 
be the cause.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to