On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:05:44 -0400, Steve Smith wrote: >FAMS is a secret interface. IBM may or may not provide the >documentation upon receipt of a signed NDA, and presumably, a "nominal" fee. > I'm aghast! You mean IBM has (finally) started keeping timestamps on (some) files but to see them a customer must sign an NDS and pay for the privilege (or use NFS)? What century does IBM think this is, anyway!?
Are you allowed even to tell me it's secret? I suppose that explains the conspicuous silence here of IBM employees. I wonder whether the meager information will be removed from future editions of the NFS description. And from the APARs. On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:39:00 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: >You probably knew this but if you can run under ISPF, batch or interactive, >use LMMSTATS. > I believe not. As an experiment, I created a couple PDS members with IEBGENER, no ISPF involved. NFS shows timestamps consistent with those in the job log and differing by 0.1995 seconds which I assume is job step overhead. ISPF member list shows no stats whatever for those members. Would LMMSTATS in a program show me any different? If you believe so, I'll try an experiment, but I'm skeptical. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
