On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:37:03 -0400, Steve Smith wrote: >The first rule of FAMS is you don't talk about FAMS. :-) > >I don't think that denying its existence is part of the contract, but I >can't say anything else about it. > Hmmm... If I IEBCOPY a PDSE to another PDSE, ISPF member list shows that the timestamps from SYSUT1 are replicated in SYSUT2. I believe this is quite deliberate.
However, NFS shows for SYSUT2 the timestamps as the time of the IEBCOPY job step, neither the timestamps shown for SYSUT1 nor the timestamps shown by ISPF. This seems wrong. Is it APARable? (If I submit an SR I'll not talk about FAMS. It seems prudent to be disingenuous here.) Perhaps an RCF? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
