>Just a thought - >Could the area R15 points to have been allocated by one of those "we'll figure >out your problem for you" >routines after the 0C4-11 and before the dump so >that when you look in the dump they provide it looks like >you should have >gotten an 0C1 rather than an 0C4-11?
Yes, Jim Mulder mentioned this already in an earlier post. In the meantime, I believe this really must have been the case. Nobody provided any information that would explain it to meant something else. I had not been involved in debugging cased once others have given up for quite some time. I'm a bit rusty in reading dumps. I just wanted to make sure I'm not missing the obvious. I feel more confidet now. Thanks everybody for your help so far. I suspect the inital cause is some kind of storage overwrite by the applicaiton white hits some other code some time later. The result is what I got; with not hint on what wrote when and where, when it should not have.... This kind of problem is difficult enough, I don't want to base my analysis and guessing on a dump I cannot trust. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
