Peter Relson wrote: >Aside from the LNKLST, this is not correct. And for the LNKLST, it is correct >only when LNKAUTH=APFTAB is in effect.
Thanks Peter! >It is at open time that a concatenation (or individual data set) is evaluated >for "APF-ness". If all data sets in the concatenation are APF-authorized then >the concatenation is considered APF authorized. This is remembered/represented >in the DEB (bit DEBAPFIN). This is similar to RACF handling of PROGRAM Class, profile **. If ALL and every libraries in the STEPLIB are listed in that profile, then the environment is 'clean' by way of speaking. >Fetch processing pays attention to DEBAPFIN. This is why a concatenation of 9 >APF-authorized data sets and 1 non-APF-authorized data sets is not considered >APF-authorized and why AC(1) would not be honored upon a fetch from such a >concatenation. Hmmm, very interesting. I need to RTFM about DEBAPFIN just to refresh my last few brain cells. Thanks Peter for your very interesting and educational reply! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
