Yes, good to know. I realised when I was writing my earlier comment that there is not much downside to defining "extra" storage, it is what we do already with a static table :-)
However, I'd still go horses-for-courses. Make the increment for the unboaded table a size which relates to the data and its usage. It'd avoid 50 unbounded tables sucking up all the storage available when only 2/3 of the storage was expected to be used. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
