Tomasz,

I understand. But the MUAs mostly link by Subject: line; I'm suggesting
that GMail could do the same, at least for notes classified as "Forums".
"We have the technology"...

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Tomasz Rola <rto...@ceti.com.pl> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 01:54:25PM -0400, zMan wrote:
> > Sure would be nice if GMail were half as good at threading as COBOL is at
> > detecting recursive calls. I see TEN different threads with the same
> > subject.
> >
> > (Yes, I understand Message-ID and that some mailers [human or otherwise]
> > remove it, thus breaking automatic threading, but for discussion
> > lists--which Google already groks, as it puts these threads into
> Forums--it
> > could use a slightly less restrictive algorithm, nu?)
>
> I am not sure if this is gmail's fault. It seems to me, bad messages
> lack the "In-Reply-To" field in their headers. Some messages from
> gmail users I have inspected display this field, some do not. Without
> it, most if not all MUAs (mail user agent - program to read and write
> emails) cannot process threads correctly.
>
> I spend considerable amount of time manually linking broken threads[0]
> in my MUA, even before I decide if the thread is worth reading. Every
> time I bless the keyboard shortcuts (never have to touch mouse to
> read). These come mostly from IBM-MAIN, sometimes from one or two
> other lists I am subscribed to.
>
> A quick inspection suggests that one of the "offenders" [1] does not
> send his emails via gmail, even as he comes with a gmail address. So
> perhaps source of the problem lies beyound gmail's domain.
>
> [0] To the point when I start thinking this should be computer's job.
>
> [1] Bill Woodger, I am looking at you but I am not accusing you,
> m'kay? But when I send this message, I will chase down your answer to
> zMan and manually link it. Again...
>
> --
> Regards,
> Tomasz Rola
>
> --
> ** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature.      **
> ** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home    **
> ** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened...      **
> **                                                                 **
> ** Tomasz Rola          mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com             **
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to