The inconsistent PARMLIB syntax horse escaped from the barn many years ago.

I am not an IBM "insider" but it is obvious to me that re-engineering every one 
of the PARMLIB consumers to support a uniform (and marvelous) syntax, while 
maintaining backward compatibility, would have been a Sisyphean task.

Plus, are there not third-party PARMLIB syntax checkers which would have been 
broken by the change?

I'm not a sysprog. When I need a PARMLIB change I send an e-mail with please 
and thank you. But I think IBM deserves thanks for what they have done, even 
though it admittedly falls way short of perfect.

Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Edward Gould
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Comments in SYS1.PARMLIB

Cheryl:


> On Aug 23, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Cheryl Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> Regarding "Letting IBM off with variations is nonsense.", I choose to think 
> of it as being pragmatic.  I can complain all day about how IBM's reduction 
> of staff is hurting the mainframe, but the fact is that they are doing it 
> despite anything I might say or do.  Believe me that putting people to work 
> on implementing "/" and "*/" in each parmlib member is NOT going to make it 
> into the line items for a new release with higher priority work and reduced 
> staff size.  

I believe in holding IBM to a standard that they themselves developed. I 
shudder to think that each parmlib member will have it own syntax. This goes 
agains every thing that IBM espouses. I will be long gone and I still think 
that this will be a dangerous precedent. As I said in my previous email, I have 
had to do updates to parmlib on the fly as a fellow sysprog forgot a comma and 
all of a sudden VTAM would not come up nor CICS due to an APF issue because of 
a stupid missing comma.  Luckily I never made the mistake.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to