As I read the macro, it wants the Address TO the address.
On 10/05/2016 03:13 PM, Neil Duffee wrote:
Caveat: as a daily digestor, responses are delayed. n00b alert: my assembler is rusty & little used these daze but doesn't "LA R1,TCB@" load the address of TCB@ into R1. After "ST R1,TCB@", I would have expected "L R1,TCB@" instead. (granted it's probably just an e-mail/transcription typo) --------> signature = 8 lines follows <-------- Neil Duffee, Joe Sysprog, uOttawa, Ottawa, Ont, Canada telephone:1 613 562 5800 x4585 fax:1 613 562 5161 mailto:NDuffee of uOttawa.ca http:/ /aix1.uOttawa.ca/ ~nduffee "How *do* you plan for something like that?" Guardian Bob, Reboot "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism." "Systems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent" John Norgauer 2004 "Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted." John McKown 2015 -----Original Message----- From: Steve Thompson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: October 4, 2016 22:47 Subject: Re: Question About ATTACHX and ECB But it was pretty simple. [xnip] The ECB was cleared by MVCL with the Getmained area, but I did have an XC SUB_ECB,SUB_ECB. Then the ATTACHX with PARAM=,ECB=SUB_ECB,and MF=(E,(1)),SF=(E,(15)) ST R1,TCB@ Capture the TCB ADDR [xnip] WAIT ECB=SUB_ECB L R3,SUB_ECB LA R1,TCB@ DETACH (1) [xnip] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
