On 10/06/2016 07:56 AM, Ray Pearce wrote:
You've been asked to post the exact contents of the ECB.
You posted that it was xx400000.
Yes, the hi order in that case I had dropped by the way I loaded the Register.
But you loaded the register with
ICM R15,7,SUB_ECB
Should this have been
ICM R15,7,SUB_ECB+1
Ray Pearce
The following code segment demonstrates the results clearly
without having to read the dump. Just look at the SUMMARY with
the REGs.
LM R1,R10,LM
ICM R1,7,ICM1
ICM R2,7,ICM1+1
ICM R3,F,ICM1
ICM R4,B'1001',ICM1+4
EX 0,*
ICM1 DC X'0123456789ABCDEF' String to TEST ICM
* MASK 1 1 1 1
* MASK 0 1 1 1
* MASK+1 0 1 1 1
* MASK+4 1 0 0 1
LM DC A(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)
It appears that I have terribly confused what the PoOP says about
ICM.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
